In absentia<\/em> removal orders have lasting consequences for people\u2019s ability to apply for immigration relief in the future. Deportation proceedings are complex and individuals must follow the various requirements, but when the notices from the government itself don\u2019t contain all of the information necessary to allow an immigrant to comply, or they are not informed that they have a right to counsel, the complexities of the process grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Immigration Law Center at BBC will continue to follow this case and it is expected that a decision from the Court this spring. The Immigration Law Center at BCC is here to offer guidance, support, and legal representation to individuals and families in deportation proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
On Monday, January 8, the Supreme Court heard consolidated oral arguments for Campos-Chavez v. Garland and Garland v. Singh. The two cases deal with the issue of whether an immigration court must enter an in absentia removal order and deny a respondent\u2019s request to rescind that order in a case where the government serves an initial notice document in deportation proceedings that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":308,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","inline_featured_image":false,"advgb_blocks_editor_width":"","advgb_blocks_columns_visual_guide":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,20],"tags":[96,141],"yoast_head":"\n
SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Deportation Notice Requirements - Immigration Law Center at BCC<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n